Wednesday, April 18, 2007

court issues decision that makes S question her faith in her heretofore favorite branch of government

i really don't even know what i could say to communicate how appalled i am by this decision.

the majority opinion stated that opponents of the act "have not demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases" ... read: we're not here to protect every woman's constitutional rights, just some.

a non-political body indeed. ignoring decades and decades of clear, strong precedent - for what?

No comments: